Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Fairness

Vredenburgh, Kate ORCID: 0000-0001-5721-5609 (2022) Fairness. In: Bullock, Justin B., Chen, Yu-Che, Himmelreich, Johannes, Hudson, Valerie M., Korinek, Anton, Young, Matthew M. and Zhang, Baobao, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 129 - 148. ISBN 9780197579329

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.8

Abstract

Despite widespread agreement that algorithmic bias is a problem, there is a lack of agreement about what to do about it. This chapter argues that what should be done about algorithmic bias depends on whether the problem of algorithmic bias is conceptualized as a problem of fairness, or some other problem of justice. It substantiates this claim by examining the debate over different formal fairness metrics. One compelling metric for measuring whether a system is fair measures whether the system is calibrated, or whether a prediction has equal evidential value regardless of an individual’s group membership. Calibration exemplifies a compelling notion of accuracy, and of fairness, in treating like cases alike. However, there can be a tradeoff between making systems fair, in this sense, and making them more just: to make more accurate predictions, a system may use social patterns that reinforce structures of unjust disadvantage. In response to this tradeoff, the chapter argues that in situations of injustice, other values of justice ought to be privileged over fairness, as fairness has no value in the absence of just background institutions. It concludes by drawing out five proposals for better governance of AI for justice and fairness from the philosophical discussion of fairness and justice in AI. These are a values-first approach to bias interventions, de-coupling decision processes, explicitly modeling structural injustice, interventions to increase data quality, and the use of (weighted) lotteries rather than decision thresholds.

Item Type: Book Section
Official URL: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford...
Additional Information: © 2024 Oxford University Press
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Date Deposited: 27 Aug 2024 11:21
Last Modified: 20 Dec 2024 00:20
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/124673

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item