Cost-effectiveness of the ACR TIRADS compared to the ATA 2015 risk stratification systems in the evaluation of incidental thyroid nodules

Pang, Emily HT, Carter, Alexander W. ORCID: 0000-0003-3793-407X, Prisman, Eitan and Kreisman, Stuart H. (2024) Cost-effectiveness of the ACR TIRADS compared to the ATA 2015 risk stratification systems in the evaluation of incidental thyroid nodules. Academic Radiology, 31 (10). 3993 - 4010. ISSN 1076-6332

Text (PIIS1076633224002101) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (4MB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Thyroid nodules are a common incidental imaging finding and prone to overdiagnosis. Several risk stratification systems have been developed to reduce unnecessary work-up, with two of the most utilized including the American Thyroid Association 2015 (ATA2015) and the newer American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) guidelines. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ATA2015 versus the TIRADS guidelines in the management of incidental thyroid nodules. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was conducted using decision tree modeling, evaluating adult patients with incidental thyroid nodules < 4 cm. Model inputs were populated using published literature, observational data, and expert opinion. Single-payer perspective, Canadian dollar currency, five-year time horizon, willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000, and discount rate of 1.5% per annum were utilized. Scenario, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results: For the base case scenario, TIRADS dominated the ATA2015 strategy by a slim margin, producing 0.005 more QALYs at $25 less cost. Results were sensitive to the malignancy rate of biopsy and the utilities of a patient with a benign nodule/subclinical malignancy or under surveillance. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that TIRADS was the more cost-effective option 79.7% of the time. Conclusion: The TIRADS guidelines may be the more cost-effective strategy by a small margin compared to ATA2015 in most scenarios when used to risk stratify incidental thyroid nodules.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.academicradiology.org/
Additional Information:	© 2024 The Association of University Radiologists
Divisions:	Health Policy
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Date Deposited:	13 May 2024 14:30
Last Modified:	20 Nov 2024 07:42
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/123041

Actions (login required)

View Item