One hundred priority questions for the development of sustainable food systems in Sub-Saharan Africa

Devenish, Adam J. M., Schmitter, Petra, Jellason, Nugun. P., Esmail, Nafeesa, Abdi, Nur M., Adanu, Selase K., Adolph, Barbara, Al-Zu’bi, Maha, Amali, Amali A., Barron, Jennie, Chapman, Abbie S.A., Chausson, Alexandre M., Chibesa, Moses, Davies, Joanne, Dugan, Emmanuel, Edwards, Glory I., Egeru, Anthony, Gebrehiwot, Tagel, Griffiths, Geoffrey H., Haile, Amleset, Hunga, Henry G., Igbine, Lizzy, Jarju, Ousman M., Keya, Francis, Khalifa, Muhammad, Ledoux, Wamba A., Lejissa, Lemlem T., Loupa, Pius, Lwanga, Jonathan, Mapedza, Everisto D., Marchant, Robert, McLoud, Tess, Mukuyu, Patience, Musah, Labram M., Mwanza, Morton, Mwitwa, Jacob, Neina, Dora, Newbold, Tim, Njogo, Samuel, Robinson, Elizabeth ORCID: 0000-0002-4950-0183, Singini, Wales, Umar, Bridget B., Wesonga, Frank, Willcock, Simon, Yang, Jingyi and Tobias, Joseph A. (2023) One hundred priority questions for the development of sustainable food systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land, 12 (10). ISSN 2073-445X

Text (Robinson_one-hundred-priority-questions--published) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa is facing an expected doubling of human population and tripling of food demand over the next quarter century, posing a range of severe environmental, political, and socio-economic challenges. In some cases, key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are in direct conflict, raising difficult policy and funding decisions, particularly in relation to trade-offs between food production, social inequality, and ecosystem health. In this study, we used a horizon-scanning approach to identify 100 practical or research-focused questions that, if answered, would have the greatest positive impact on addressing these trade-offs and ensuring future productivity and resilience of food-production systems across sub-Saharan Africa. Through direct canvassing of opinions, we obtained 1339 questions from 331 experts based in 55 countries. We then used online voting and participatory workshops to produce a final list of 100 questions divided into 12 thematic sections spanning topics from gender inequality to technological adoption and climate change. Using data on the background of respondents, we show that perspectives and priorities can vary, but they are largely consistent across different professional and geographical contexts. We hope these questions provide a template for establishing new research directions and prioritising funding decisions in sub-Saharan Africa.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.mdpi.com/journal/land
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Authors
Divisions:	Geography & Environment Grantham Research Institute
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
JEL classification:	Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q10 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General
Date Deposited:	09 Nov 2023 12:06
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 03:56
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120693

Actions (login required)

View Item