Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Mediavilla, Roberto, Felez-Nobrega, Mireia, McGreevy, Kerry R, Monistrol-Mula, Anna, Bravo-Ortiz, María-Fe, Bayón, Carmen, Giné-Vázquez, Iago, Villaescusa, Rut, Muñoz-Sanjosé, Ainoa, Aguilar-Ortiz, Salvatore, Figueiredo, Natasha, Nicaise, Pablo, Park, A-La ORCID: 0000-0002-4704-4874, Petri-Romão, Papoula, Purgato, Marianna, Witteveen, Anke B, Underhill, James, Barbui, Corrado, Bryant, Richard, Kalisch, Raffael, Lorant, Vincent, McDaid, David ORCID: 0000-0003-0744-2664, Melchior, Maria, Sijbrandij, Marit, Haro, Josep Maria and Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis (2023) Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Mental Health, 26 (1). ISSN 2755-9734

Text (Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (519kB)

• Author
• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based mental health interventions to support healthcare workers (HCWs) in crisis settings are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capacity of a mental health intervention in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in HCWs, relative to enhanced care as usual (eCAU), amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an analyst-blind, parallel, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. We recruited HCWs with psychological distress from Madrid and Catalonia (Spain). The intervention arm received a stepped-care programme consisting of two WHO-developed interventions adapted for HCWs: Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) and Problem Management Plus (PM+). Each intervention lasted 5 weeks and was delivered remotely by non-specialist mental health providers. HCWs reporting psychological distress after DWM completion were invited to continue to PM+. The primary endpoint was self-reported anxiety/depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale) at week 21. FINDINGS: Between 3 November 2021 and 31 March 2022, 115 participants were randomised to stepped care and 117 to eCAU (86% women, mean age 37.5). The intervention showed a greater decrease in anxiety/depression symptoms compared with eCAU at the primary endpoint (baseline-adjusted difference 4.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.7; standardised effect size 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Brief stepped-care psychological interventions reduce anxiety and depression during a period of stress among HCWs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results can inform policies and actions to protect the mental health of HCWs during major health crises and are potentially rapidly replicable in other settings where workers are affected by global emergencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04980326.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	02 Jun 2023 13:24
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 20:45
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/119325

Actions (login required)

View Item