Epistemic injustice and mental health research: a pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise

Okoroji, Celestin ORCID: 0000-0002-6238-7074, Mackay, Tanya, Robotham, Dan, Beckford, Davino and Pinfold, Vanessa (2023) Epistemic injustice and mental health research: a pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. ISSN 1664-0640

Text (Epistemic injustice and mental health research. A pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (225kB)

• Author

Abstract

“Epistemic injustice” refers to how people from marginalized groups are denied opportunities to create knowledge and derive meaning from their experiences. In the mental health field, epistemic injustice occurs in both research and service delivery systems and particularly impacts people from racialized communities. Lived experience involvement and leadership are often proposed as methods of combatting epistemic injustice, a tool for ensuring the views of people at the center of an issue are heard and can inform decision-making. However, this approach is not without challenges. In this paper, we draw on our work as intermediary organizations that center lived experience perspectives to challenge epistemic injustice. We highlight two problems we have identified in working in the mental health research field: “elite capture” and “epistemic exploitation”. We believe that these problems are barriers to the radical and structural change required for epistemic justice to occur. We propose a pragmatic approach to addressing these issues. Based on our work we suggest three considerations for researchers and our own organizations to consider when involving people with lived experience. These include reflecting on the purpose of creating knowledge, with a focus on impact. Embedding lived experience roles, with appropriate employment, support and remuneration, and acknowledging that it may be necessary to work alongside existing systems as a “critical friend” while developing new spaces and structures for alternative forms of knowledge. Finally, the mental health research system needs to change. We believe these three considerations will help us better move toward epistemic justice in mental health research.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Authors
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Date Deposited:	05 May 2023 13:24
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 03:43
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118806

Actions (login required)

View Item