Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis

Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M., Marciniuk, Fernanda L, Wagner, Anita K., Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G. S., Vogler, Sabine, Mossialos, Elias ORCID: 0000-0001-8664-9297, Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. and Naci, Huseyin ORCID: 0000-0002-7192-5751 (2023) Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 22. ISSN 2667-193X

[img] Text (Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (770kB)

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506

Abstract

Background: Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries. Methods: All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared. Findings: Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit. Interpretation: High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US. Funding: None.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-lancet-r...
Additional Information: © 2023 The Author.
Divisions: Health Policy
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited: 03 May 2023 11:03
Last Modified: 12 Dec 2024 03:42
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118777

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics