Biodiversity-food trade-offs when agricultural land is spared from production

Palmer, Charles ORCID: 0000-0002-1252-179X, Groom, Ben ORCID: 0000-0003-0729-143X, Langton, Steve and Sileci, Lorenzo ORCID: 0000-0003-4110-9427 (2022) Biodiversity-food trade-offs when agricultural land is spared from production. Geography and Environment Discussion Paper Series (34). Department of Geography and Environment, LSE, London, UK.

Text (Biodiversity-food trade-offs when agricultural land is spared from production) - Published Version Available under License Other license. Download (1MB)

• Publisher
• Author
• Author
• Author

Abstract

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework proposes to address biodiversity decline by expanding areas under conservation. Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes, the world’s predominant land use, could involve sparing, or setting aside, agricultural land from production, implying biodiversity-food trade-offs. Employing bird species and agricultural data, we undertake a novel empirical analysis of such trade-offs on a set-aside scheme implemented in England between 1992-2007. Expanding set-aside increases bird species abundance and richness by, respectively, 1.2-2.1% and 0.7-0.9%, but has no impact on diversity (Shannon-Wiener index). These effects are discontinuous, subject to thresholds in set-aside areas. A minimum 3% of agricultural land set aside is required for a positive effect on biodiversity while 13% of agricultural land generates a 15-25% and 30-35% increase in abundance and richness, respectively. Estimates of short- and long-run effects show that impacts are larger in the long-run. Expanding set-aside is also associated with a 10-17% decline in cereal output, with weak evidence of an attenuating land-sparing effect on yields. Our results suggest that although biodiversity-food trade-offs are likely in high-yield agricultural landscapes, such as those in England, the risk of a reduction in food supply could be minimised in settings where there is still scope for intensification.

Item Type:	Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Official URL:	http://www.lse.ac.uk/geography-and-environment/res...
Additional Information:	© 2022 The Authors
Divisions:	Geography & Environment Grantham Research Institute
Subjects:	S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
JEL classification:	Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services; Biodiversity Conservation; Bioeconomics R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations
Date Deposited:	14 Sep 2022 12:54
Last Modified:	19 Dec 2024 00:22
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116614

Actions (login required)

View Item