There are four schools of thought on reforming peer review – can they co-exist?

Waltman, Ludo, Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, Pinfield, Stephen and Buckley Woods, Helen (2022) There are four schools of thought on reforming peer review – can they co-exist? Impact of Social Sciences Blog (24 Mar 2022). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences-2022-03-24-there-are-four-schools-of-thought) - Published Version Download (182kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

Outlining their recent research into the different interests and commitments of groups looking to reform and improve scientific peer review, Ludo Waltman, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, and Helen Buckley Woods identify four schools of thought on the subject. Discussing their different aims and objectives, they highlight commonalities between them and also key areas in which they diverge. They suggest that in understanding these positions, it opens space for the purposeful inclusion of more varied forms of peer review for research.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2022 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Date Deposited:	28 Jun 2022 23:42
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 03:30
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/114733

Actions (login required)

View Item