Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Impact of COVID-19 on food insecurity using multiple waves of high frequency household surveys

Dasgupta, Shouro and Robinson, Elizabeth ORCID: 0000-0002-4950-0183 (2022) Impact of COVID-19 on food insecurity using multiple waves of high frequency household surveys. Scientific Reports. ISSN 2045-2322

[img] Text (s41598-022-05664-3) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

In response to the rapid spread of COVID-19, governments across the globe have implemented local lockdowns that have led to increased unemployment and have disrupted local and international transport routes and supply chains. Whilst such efforts aim to slow or stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, they have also resulted in increased food insecurity, whether due to reduced incomes or increased food prices. This is the first paper to track food insecurity and its determinants during the pandemic using multi-country and multi-wave evidence. Using data from 11 countries and up to 6 waves of High-Frequency Phone Survey data (household-level surveys) on COVID-19 and its impacts, we use a fixed-effects linear probability model to investigate the socioeconomic determinants of food insecurity during the pandemic for each country using household-level data over multiple waves. We control for socioeconomic characteristics including gender and education of the household head; income and poverty status of the households during the pandemic; safety nets in the form of cash and food assistance; coping strategies adopted by households; and price effects of major food items. Our findings suggest that cash safety nets appear to have been more effective than food in terms of reducing food insecurity during the pandemic; and that those particularly hard hit are female headed-households (highest in Malawi: 0.541, 95% CI 0.516, 0.569; lowest in Cambodia: 0.023, 95% CI 0.022, 0.024), the less educated (highest in Djibouti: -0.232, 95% CI -0.221, -0.244; lowest in Nigeria: 0.006, 95% CI -0.005, -0.007), and poorer households (highest in Mali: 0.382, 95% CI 0.364, 0.402; lowest in Chad: 0.135, 95% CI 0.129, 0.142). In line with the existing literature, our results show that, even controlling for income loss and poverty status, those households who had to borrow rather than rely on savings had a higher probability of suffering from food insecurity. Distinct differences in the efficacy of safety nets across the 11 countries, and the differential impact of the pandemic on different groups within societies, suggest indepth country-specific studies are needed to understand why some countries have coped better than others. Our paper highlights the importance of improving household resilience to future systemic crises, and using evidence-based best practice in the design of relevant policy instruments.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.nature.com/srep/
Additional Information: © 2022 Springer Nature
Divisions: Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Date Deposited: 17 Jan 2022 14:57
Last Modified: 12 Dec 2024 02:48
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/113447

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics