Peer review for academic jobs and grants continues to be shaped by metrics, especially if your reviewer is highly ranked

Langfeldt, Liv, Aksnes, Dag W. and Reymert, Ingvild (2021) Peer review for academic jobs and grants continues to be shaped by metrics, especially if your reviewer is highly ranked. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (26 Nov 2021). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences-2021-11-26-peer-review-for-academic-jobs-and) - Published Version Download (235kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

The aim of peer review for research grants and academic hiring boards is to provide expert independent judgement on the quality of research proposals and candidates. Based on findings from a recent survey, Liv Langfeldt, Dag W. Aksnes and Ingvild Reymert, find metrics continue to play a significant role in shaping these decisions, especially for reviewers who are highly ranked themselves.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2021 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZA Information resources
Date Deposited:	18 Jan 2022 12:03
Last Modified:	11 Dec 2024 20:58
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/113095

Actions (login required)

View Item