How should we reconcile self-regarding and pro-social motivations? A renaissance of “Das Adam Smith Problem”

Gold, Natalie (2020) How should we reconcile self-regarding and pro-social motivations? A renaissance of “Das Adam Smith Problem”. Social Philosophy & Policy, 37 (1). 80 - 102. ISSN 0265-0525

Text (adam-smith-problem-origins-of-political-economy-final-version) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (461kB)

• Author

Abstract

“Das Adam Smith Problem” is the name given by eighteenth-century German scholars to the question of how to reconcile the role of self-interest in the Wealth of Nations with Smith’s advocacy of sympathy in Theory of Moral Sentiments. As the discipline of economics developed, it focused on the interaction of selfish agents, pursuing their private interests. However, behavioral economists have rediscovered the existence and importance of multiple motivations, and a new Das Adam Smith Problem has arisen, of how to accommodate self-regarding and pro-social motivations in a single system. This question is particularly important because of evidence of motivation crowding, where paying people can backfire, with payments achieving the opposite effects of those intended. Psychologists have proposed a mechanism for the crowding out of “intrinsic motivations” for doing a task, when payment is used to incentivize effort. However, they argue that pro-social motivations are different from these intrinsic motivations, implying that crowding out of pro-social motivations requires a different mechanism. In this essay I present an answer to the new Das Adam Smith problem, proposing a mechanism that can underpin the crowding out of both pro-social and intrinsic motivations, whereby motivations are prompted by frames and motivation crowding is underpinned by the crowding out of frames. I explore some of the implications of this mechanism for research and policy.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-phi...
Additional Information:	© 2020 Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation
Divisions:	CPNSS
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Date Deposited:	18 Mar 2021 10:09
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 02:29
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/109218

Actions (login required)

View Item