Mirrors without warnings

Frigg, Roman ORCID: 0000-0003-0812-0907 and Nguyen, James (2019) Mirrors without warnings. Synthese. ISSN 1573-0964

Text (Mirrors without warnings) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (335kB)

• Author

Abstract

Veritism, the position that truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability, seems to be in tension with the observation that much of our best science is not, strictly speaking, true when interpreted literally. This generates a paradox: (1) truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability; (2) the claims of science have to be taken literally; (3) much of what science produces is not literally true and yet it is acceptable. We frame Elgin’s project in True Enough as being motivated by, and offering a particular resolution to, this paradox. We discuss the paradox with a focus on scientific models and argue that there is another resolution available which is compatible with retaining veritism: rejecting the idea that scientific models should be interpreted literally.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
Divisions:	Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited:	29 Apr 2019 07:55
Last Modified:	16 Apr 2024 06:00
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/100504

Actions (login required)

View Item