Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Conscientious objection to abortion: Zambian healthcare practitioners' beliefs and practices

Freeman, Emily ORCID: 0000-0001-9396-1350 and Coast, Ernestina ORCID: 0000-0002-8703-307X (2019) Conscientious objection to abortion: Zambian healthcare practitioners' beliefs and practices. Social Science & Medicine, 221. pp. 106-114. ISSN 0277-9536

[img] Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (650kB)

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.018


The potential health consequences of limiting access to safe abortion make it imperative to understand how conscience-based refusal to provide legally permitted services is understood and carried out by healthcare practitioners. This in-depth study of conscientious objection to abortion provision in Zambia is based on qualitative interviews (N = 51) with practitioners working across the health system who object and do not object to providing abortion services in accordance with their cadre. Interviews were conducted in September 2015. Regardless of whether practitioners self-identified as providers or non-providers of abortion services, they presented similar religiously-informed understandings of abortion as a morally-challenging practice that is, or not, shifted from iniquity to acceptability based on the reasons for which it has been requested or the likelihood of unsafe abortion if services are not provided. These contextual factors presented a series of tipping points for participants, rather than a single justification for providing abortion. Subsequently both groups reported that their decisions about providing services were complex and changeable, rather than clear one-time resolutions. This shaped their practices, both in terms of whether or not they provided services, and when and how they delivered them. Practitioners self-identifying as non-providers, and those self-identifying as providers, reported provision, counselling, and referral practices likely to lessen women's access to safe legal abortion. In this way, conscientious objection in practice could be understood as a continuum of behaviours rather than a binary position. Our results suggest that data on prevalence of claims to conscientious objector status may underestimate the impact of practitioners' religious, moral and ethical beliefs on abortion accessibility. In Zambia, eliminating practitioners' right to conscientious objection alone or conducting rights-based advocacy may therefore not significantly increase access to safe abortion.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2018 The Authors
Divisions: International Development
Personal Social Services Research Unit
LSE Health
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Date Deposited: 10 Dec 2018 16:55
Last Modified: 04 Jul 2024 06:51
Projects: ES/ L007828/1
Funders: Economic & Social Research Council, Department for International Development, LSE Research Infrastructure and Investment Fund

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics