There is little evidence to suggest peer reviewer training programmes improve the quality of reviews

Khoo, Shaun (2018) There is little evidence to suggest peer reviewer training programmes improve the quality of reviews. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (23 May 2018). Website.

Preview

Text - Published Version Download (109kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

In little more than a year a number of peer reviewer training programmes have launched, promising to help early-career researchers learn how to do peer review, review more efficiently, and connect with editors at top journals. This follows an expressed need from graduate students and postdocs for precisely this sort of training. But can these new programmes deliver? And as many providers suggest moves towards a subscription-based model, are they worth individuals or institutions paying for them? Shaun Khoo examines the evidence base and finds that there is little to suggest that peer reviewer training programmes actually improve the quality of article reviews.

Item Type:	Online resource (Website)
Official URL:	http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences
Additional Information:	© 2018 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Date Deposited:	15 Aug 2018 14:22
Last Modified:	13 Sep 2024 13:38
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/89897

Actions (login required)

View Item