Booth, Jonathan E. 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8563-4613
(2018)
The Supreme Court's 'fair share' case is an existential threat to public sector unions. But it may force them to engage and embrace choice.
USApp - American Politics and Policy Blog
(08 Mar 2018).
Website.
|
Text
- Published Version
Download (147kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The US Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 case, which maintains that mandatory public sector union dues violate workers' First Amendment rights. Jonathan E. Booth argues that despite the case's free speech claims, such 'fair share' fees actually enhance the voice and representation of workers. He writes that if the Court finds against these fees, public sector unions may face declining memberships and falling incomes, which they could counter by increasing engagement with their members in order to prove their value.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog |
| Additional Information: | © 2018 The Author(s) |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management K Law > K Law (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jul 2018 13:26 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2024 06:44 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/89333 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics