Regulatory chill? Why TTIP could inhibit governments from regulating in the public interest

Siles-Brügge, Gabriel and Butler, Nicolette (2015) Regulatory chill? Why TTIP could inhibit governments from regulating in the public interest. Democratic Audit Blog (17 Jun 2015). Blog Entry.

Text (democraticaudit.com-Beppe Grillos Five Star Movement is a new kind of radical and popular opposition to the Italian gover) - Published Version Download (125kB)

• http://www.democraticaudit.com/2015/06/1...

Abstract

On 10 June a key vote was held in the European Parliament on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). As Gabriel Siles-Brügge and Nicolette Butler write, much of the criticism of TTIP has focused on its impact on public healthcare systems and the role of ‘corporate tribunals’. They argue that this overlooks one of TTIP’s central purposes: a series of provisions that could make it more difficult for governments to regulate in the public interest for the sake of promoting regulatory convergence between the EU and the US.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	http://www.democraticaudit.com
Additional Information:	© 2015 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory J Political Science > JC Political theory J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	14 Jun 2017 08:01
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 03:47
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/81130

Actions (login required)

View Item