Dunleavy, Patrick 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2650-6398
(2011)
The Research Excellence Framework is lumbering and expensive. For a fraction of the cost, a digital census of academic research would create unrivalled and genuine information about UK universities’ research performance.
Impact of Social Sciences Blog
(10 Jun 2011).
Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (62kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Government efforts at assessing university research via the REF involve universities and hundred of senior academics in perpetuating a mythical, bureaucratic form of ‘peer review’. Inherently these exercises only produce ‘evidence’ that has been fatally structured from the outset by bureaucratic rules and university games-playing. Patrick Dunleavy argues that in the digital era, this mountain of special form-filling and bogus ‘reviewing by committee’ has become completely unnecessary.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences |
| Additional Information: | © 2011 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Apr 2017 09:46 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 17:57 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72781 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics