Fuller, Steve (2014) A modest proposal to solve the problem of peer review: Treat evaluation as an in-house publishing function. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (16 Jun 2014). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (139kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Peer review is under constant scrutiny due to its failure to adapt to a more effective model in the digital age. Steve Fuller argues that academic evaluation proceeds much too slowly for the quite simple reason that academics are valued mainly for being productive and not evaluative. It may be the job of publishers to rescue the academic brand – from academia itself — by hiring peer reviewers directly. To ensure quality control in academic knowledge production, peer review may need to be internalised as a regular publishing cost.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences |
| Additional Information: | © 2014 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2017 10:39 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 19:13 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/71358 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics