Stevens, Andrew (2016) Taxes on bottled water are better at raising money than reducing litter. USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog (06 Dec 2016). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (83kB) | Preview |
Abstract
With environmental concerns on the rise, many US states have introduced policies to reduce waste, including taxes on packaging. In new research using a case study of the introduction of a bottled water tax in Washington State, Andrew Stevens finds that such taxes have far less of an impact than was originally expected. For an average tax increase of 9 percent, consumers only reduced consumption of bottled water by 6 percent. Other policies, such as deposit and refund systems, he writes, are far more effective in reducing plastic bottle waste and litter.
Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
Additional Information: | © 2016 The Authors, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science © CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 |
Divisions: | LSE |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) |
Date Deposited: | 10 Feb 2017 11:19 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 15:01 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/69316 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |