Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Surviving elections: election violence, incumbent victory, and post-election repercussions

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D. and Jablonski, Ryan S. (2016) Surviving elections: election violence, incumbent victory, and post-election repercussions. British Journal of Political Science. ISSN 0007-1234

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Download (911kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1017/S000712341600020X

Abstract

It is often assumed that government-sponsored election violence increases the probability that incumbent leaders remain in power. Using cross-national data, we show that election violence increases the probability of incumbent victory, but can generate risky post-election dynamics. These differences in the consequences of election violence reflect changes in the strategic setting over the course of the election cycle. In the pre-election period, anti-incumbent collective action tends to be focused on the election itself, either through voter mobilization or opposition-organized election boycotts. In the post-election period, by contrast, when a favorable electoral outcome is no longer a possibility, anti-government collective action more often takes the form of mass political protest, which in turn can lead to costly repercussions for incumbent leaders.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information: © 2016 Cambridge University Press
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Sets: Departments > Government
Date Deposited: 13 Jan 2016 13:50
Last Modified: 20 May 2019 02:01
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/64957

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics