Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Why a move to a simultaneous Presidential Primary system might be counter-productive

Deltas, George, Herrera, Herrera and Polborn, Mattias (2015) Why a move to a simultaneous Presidential Primary system might be counter-productive. USApp– American Politics and Policy Blog (28 Jul 2015). Website.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (125kB) | Preview

Abstract

Despite the current wall-to-wall coverage of the 2016 primary race, the primary elections themselves are not scheduled to begin until February 2016, and will last until June. This drawn-out primary cycle gives a great deal of influence to a small number of voters in early primary states, such as Iowa and New Hampshire. George Deltas, Helios Herrera and Mattias Polborn look at proposed alternatives to this system, in the form of a one-day national primary system or one where all states in the Northeast, Midwest, West and South would vote simultaneously. Using models of voter information, they argue that a sequential voting system performs much better than a one-day national primary, but that the parties could improve the system even further by encouraging lagging candidates to drop out more quickly.

Item Type: Online resource (Website)
Official URL: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/
Additional Information: © 2015 The Authors, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science.; Online
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States)
Sets: Collections > LSE American Politics and Policy (USAPP) Blog
Date Deposited: 12 Aug 2015 13:35
Last Modified: 22 May 2020 23:20
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/63131

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics