Bandiera, Oriana and Levy, Gilat (2004) Robin Hood's compromise: land reforms, inequality, redistribution and moral hazard. 4410. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK.Full text not available from this repository.
This Paper analyses an unusually conservative type of redistribution. We take land from the very rich, as usual, but give it to the rich instead of the poor. We show that this type of reform reduces agency costs, thus increasing productivity, total surplus in the economy, and workers’ welfare. Compared to the classic redistribution ‘to the tiller’ it does worse in terms of equity and does not give the poor a collaterizable asset but it is likely to be more sustainable, both economically and politically.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Discussion Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2004 Oriana Bandiera and Gilat Levy|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
|Journal of Economic Literature Classification System:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information
D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D30 - General
|Sets:||Collections > Economists Online
Departments > Economics
Research centres and groups > Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD)
|Date Deposited:||05 Jun 2008 08:21|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|