Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Modelling the risk-benefit impact of H1N1 influenza vaccines

Phillips, L.D., Fasolo, Barbara, Zafiropoulous, N., Eichler, H.-G., Ehmann, F., Jekerle, V., Kramarz, P., Nicoll, A. and Lonngren, T. (2013) Modelling the risk-benefit impact of H1N1 influenza vaccines. European Journal of Public Health, 23 (4). pp. 674-678. ISSN 1101-1262

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt006


BACKGROUND: Shortly after the H1N1 influenza virus reached pandemic status in June 2009, the benefit-risk project team at the European Medicines Agency recognized this presented a research opportunity for testing the usefulness of a decision analysis model in deliberations about approving vaccines soon based on limited data or waiting for more data. Undertaken purely as a research exercise, the model was not connected to the ongoing assessment by the European Medicines Agency, which approved the H1N1 vaccines on 25 September 2009. METHODS: A decision tree model constructed initially on 1 September 2009, and slightly revised subsequently as new data were obtained, represented an end-of-September or end-of-October approval of vaccines. The model showed combinations of uncertain events, the severity of the disease and the vaccines' efficacy and safety, leading to estimates of numbers of deaths and serious disabilities. The group based their probability assessments on available information and background knowledge about vaccines and similar pandemics in the past. RESULTS: Weighting the numbers by their joint probabilities for all paths through the decision tree gave a weighted average for a September decision of 216 500 deaths and serious disabilities, and for a decision delayed to October of 291 547, showing that an early decision was preferable. CONCLUSIONS: The process of constructing the model facilitated communications among the group's members and led to new insights for several participants, while its robustness built confidence in the decision. These findings suggest that models might be helpful to regulators, as they form their preferences during the process of deliberation and debate, and more generally, for public health issues when decision makers face considerable uncertainty.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2013 The Authors
Divisions: Management
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2013 09:15
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2021 02:04
Funders: European Medicines Agency (EMA)

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item