Dunleavy, Patrick ORCID: 0000-0002-2650-6398 (2011) The Research Excellence Framework is lumbering and expensive: for a fraction of the cost, a digital census of academic research would create unrivalled and genuine information about UK universities’ research performance. British Politics and Policy at LSE (09 Jun 2011). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (58kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Government efforts at assessing university research via the REF involve universities and hundred of senior academics in perpetuating a mythical, bureaucratic form of ‘peer review’. Inherently these exercises only produce ‘evidence’ that has been fatally structured from the outset by bureaucratic rules and university games-playing. Patrick Dunleavy argues that in the digital era, this mountain of special form-filling and bogus ‘reviewing by committee’ has become completely unnecessary.
Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/ |
Additional Information: | © 2011 the author |
Divisions: | Government Public Policy Group |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2011 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 17:50 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/36734 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |