Marsden, David (2004) Unions and procedural justice: an alternative to the 'common rule'. 613. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Download (4Mb) | Preview
Can unions substitute a procedural justice role for their traditional reliance on establishing a ‘common rule’? The decline of ‘bureaucratic’ models of employee management and the rise of performance pay and performance management conflicts with the common rule as management seek to tie rewards more closely to individual and organisational performance. CEP studies of performance pay in the British public services illustrate the potential for a procedural justice role to ensure that such pay systems are operated fairly, otherwise they risk demotivating staff. Evidence is presented to show that employees regard unions as effective vehicles for procedural justice. In this way, management can achieve better operation of their incentive schemes, and employees may experience less unfairness and poisoned work relations.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Discussion Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2004 David Marsden|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD100 Land Use
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
|Journal of Economic Literature Classification System:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration > M12 - Personnel Management
|Sets:||Research centres and groups > Employment Relations and Organisational Behaviour Group
Collections > Economists Online
Research centres and groups > Centre for Economic Performance (CEP)
|Date Deposited:||29 Feb 2008|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|