Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The third way and social welfare : the myth of post-emotionalism

Dean, Hartley (2003) The third way and social welfare : the myth of post-emotionalism. Social Policy and Administration, 37 (7). pp. 695-708. ISSN 1467-9515

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (181Kb) | Preview

Abstract

The ‘passive’ welfare state was accused of promoting a dependency culture. ‘Active’ welfare and the ‘what works?’ approach of Britain’s New Labour government is allegedly implicated in an age of post-emotionalism, in which people are largely indifferent to the needs of others and committed primarily to their personal well-being. This paper seeks first, to extend recent debates about agency and motivation in social policy and relate them to the notion of post-emotionalism. Second, it draws on a recent empirical study of popular and welfare provider discourses, which suggests that popular opinion can accommodate an appreciation of human interdependency, while welfare providers remain committed to a public service ethos. None the less, Third Way thinking is associated with a narrowing of solidaristic responsibilities. The problem for the future of health, social care and state welfare policies lies not with the imagined consequences of post-emotionalism, so much as with an ideological context that perpetuates a distorted ethic of responsibility.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/SPOL
Additional Information: This is an electronic version of an Article published in Social Policy and Administration 37(7) pp. 695-708 © 2003 Blackwell Publishing. LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website.
Library of Congress subject classification: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Rights: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/usingTheLibrary/academicSupport/OA/depositYourResearch.aspx
Date Deposited: 23 Jun 2006
URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/354/

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only