Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Centre assessment grades in 2020: a natural experiment for investigating bias in teacher judgements

Magowan, Louis (2023) Centre assessment grades in 2020: a natural experiment for investigating bias in teacher judgements. Journal of Computational Social Science, 6 (2). 609 - 653. ISSN 2432-2717

[img] Text (Centre assessment grades in 2020. A a natural experiment for investigating bias in teacher judgements) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB)
Identification Number: 10.1007/s42001-023-00206-x

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic meant that, in 2020, students in England were unable to sit their examinations and instead received predicted grades, or “centre assessment grades” (CAGs), from their teachers to allow them to progress. Using the Grading and Admissions Data for England (GRADE) dataset for students from 2018 to 2020, this study treats the use of CAGs as a natural experiment for causally understanding how teacher judgements of academic ability may be biased according to the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of their students. A variety of machine learning models were trained on the 2018–19 data and then used to generate predictions for what the 2020 students were likely to have received had their examinations taken place as usual. The differences between these predictions and the CAGs that students received were calculated and then averaged across students’ different characteristics, revealing what the treatment effects of the use of CAGs were likely to have been for different types of students. No evidence of absolute negative bias against students of any demographic or socio-economic characteristic was found, with all groups of students having received higher CAGs than the grades they were likely to have received had they sat their examinations. Some evidence for relative bias was found, with consistent, but insubstantial differences being observed in the treatment effects of certain groups. However, when higher-order interactions of student characteristics were considered, these differences became more substantial. Intersectional perspectives which emphasise interactions and sub-group differences should be used more widely within quantitative educational equalities research.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/journal/42001
Additional Information: © 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions: Methodology
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
L Education
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2023 23:25
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2024 17:48
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/119345

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics