Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network meta-analysis

Mavridis, Dimitris, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, Moustaki, Irini, Chaimani, Anna, Porcher, Raphaël, Boutron, Isabelle and Ravaud, Philippe (2023) Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 154. pp. 188-196. ISSN 0895-4356

[img] Text (Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network-meta analysis) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (713kB)

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.12.025

Abstract

Objectives: Ranking metrics in network meta-analysis (NMA) are computed separately for each outcome. Our aim is to 1) present graphical ways to group competing interventions considering multiple outcomes and 2) use conjoint analysis for placing weights on the various outcomes based on the stakeholders’ preferences. Study Design and Setting: We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) and hierarchical tree clustering to visualize the extent of similarity of interventions in terms of the relative effects they produce through a random effect NMA. We reanalyzed a published network of 212 psychosis trials taking three outcomes into account as follows: reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia, all-cause treatment discontinuation, and weight gain. Results: Conjoint analysis provides a mathematical method to transform judgements into weights that can be subsequently used to visually represent interventions on a two-dimensional plane or through a dendrogram. These plots provide insightful information about the clustering of interventions. Conclusion: Grouping interventions can help decision makers not only to identify the optimal ones in terms of benefit-risk balance but also choose one from the best cluster based on other grounds, such as cost, implementation etc. Placing weights on outcomes allows considering patient profile or preferences.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Divisions: Statistics
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2023 12:03
Last Modified: 19 May 2024 03:27
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118272

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics