Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A social-psychological examination of academic precarity as an organizational practice and subjective experience

Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan ORCID: 0000-0003-3412-4311 and Gleibs, Ilka Helene ORCID: 0000-0002-9913-250X (2022) A social-psychological examination of academic precarity as an organizational practice and subjective experience. British Journal of Social Psychology. ISSN 0144-6665

[img] Text (British J Social Psychol - 2022 - Albayrak‐Aydemir - A social‐psychological examination of academic precarity as an) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (531kB)

Identification Number: 10.1111/bjso.12607

Abstract

Research and teaching conditions have, particularly for those who are junior or from disadvantaged backgrounds, deteriorated considerably over the years in the higher education sector. Unequal opportunities in access and advancement in careers have led to increasing levels of precarity in the higher education sector. Although the concept of precarity has been grasped in many other disciplines, the social-psychological understanding of this concept remains unexplored. In this paper, we aim to develop a social-psychological understanding of precarity to examine how identity dynamics and intergroup relations, as well as associated organizational controls, reinforce inequality regimes and power structures that create precarious conditions in academia. In doing so, we use social identity theory and system justification theory under an inequality regime framework. We argue that even though change towards equality and equity in academia should be possible, it is difficult to achieve this because of entrenched identity interests by power holders and the perceived legitimacy of the existing system. Therefore, academic precarity should be recognized both as a subjective experience and as an organizational practice to make inequalities more visible and decrease the perceptions of legitimacy—and to eventually achieve a fundamental positive transformation in academia.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: H Social Sciences
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2022 17:18
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2022 12:24
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/117269

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics