People view judicial figures previously accused of sexual misconduct as a threat to women’s rights

Baker, Melissa N. and Canelo, Kayla S. (2022) People view judicial figures previously accused of sexual misconduct as a threat to women’s rights. USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog (17 Jun 2022). Blog Entry.

Text (usappblog-2022-06-17-people-view-judicial-figures-previously-accused) - Published Version Download (195kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2022/0...

Abstract

With the US Supreme Court likely to soon announce its decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision, in a new study, Melissa N. Baker and Kayla S. Canelo look at how previous accusations of sexual misconduct toward judges might affect the public’s perception of their ability to rule on issues related to women’s rights. They find that people perceive judges who have been previously accused of sexual misconduct are more of a threat to the rights of women, and that only women felt that such judges would be less likely to rule fairly on women’s rights cases.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/
Additional Information:	© 2022 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology K Law > K Law (General) J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States)
Date Deposited:	23 Aug 2022 13:21
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 03:38
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116185

Actions (login required)

View Item