Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI-Br)

Gonçalves Pacheco, João Pedro, Scopel Hoffmann, Mauricio, Braun, Luiza Elizabete, Poletto Medeiros, Isabella, Casarotto, Damaris, Hauck, Simone, Porru, Fabio, Herlo, Michael and Crestani Calegaro, Vitor (2022) Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI-Br). Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. ISSN 2237-6089 (In Press)

[img] Text (Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI-Br)) - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (470kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text (Pacheco_2022_TPP_accepted_Supplementary_material) - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (460kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Objective There are no validated instruments to measure education-related stress in Brazilian university students. Thus, we aimed to translate and test internal reliability, convergent/discriminant validity, and measurement equivalence of the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI). Methods The translation protocol was carried out by two independent translators. The instrument was culturally adapted after a pilot version that was administered to 36 university students. The final version (HESI-Br) was administered to 1021 university students (Mean age = 28.3, SD = 9.6, 76.7% female) via an online questionnaire that extended from September 1 to October 15, 2020. Factor structure was estimated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in the first half of the data set. We tested the best EFA-derived model with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the second half. Convergent/discriminant validity was tested using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS- 21). Sex, age groups, period of study, family income and area of study were used to test measurement equivalence. Results EFA suggested five factors: career dissatisfaction; faculty shortcomings; high workload; financial concerns; and toxic learning environment. CFA supported the 5-factor model (15 items), but not a higher order factor, suggesting multidimensionality. All 5 factors presented acceptable internal reliabilities, with Cronbach’s α ≥.72 and McDonald’s ω ≥.64. CFA models indicate that HESI-Br and DASS-21 assess different but correlated underlying latent constructs, supporting discriminant validity. Equivalence was ascertained for all tested groups. Conclusions The 15-item HESI-Br is a reliable and invariant multidimensional instrument for assessing relevant stressors among university students in Brazil.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.scielo.br/j/trends/
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors
Divisions: Personal Social Services Research Unit
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited: 12 May 2022 10:00
Last Modified: 13 May 2022 09:39
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/115090

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics