Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

People versus machines: introducing the HIRE framework

Will, Paris, Krpan, Dario ORCID: 0000-0002-3420-4672 and Lordan, Grace (2023) People versus machines: introducing the HIRE framework. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56 (2). 1071 - 1100. ISSN 0269-2821

[img] Text (Lordan_people-versus-machines--published) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (806kB)

Identification Number: 10.1007/s10462-022-10193-6

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the recruitment process is becoming a more common method for organisations to hire new employees. Despite this, there is little consensus on whether AI should have widespread use in the hiring process, and in which contexts. In order to bring more clarity to research findings, we propose the HIRE (Human, (Artificial) Intelligence, Recruitment, Evaluation) framework with the primary aim of evaluating studies which investigate how Artificial Intelligence can be integrated into the recruitment process with respect to gauging whether AI is an adequate, better, or worse substitute for human recruiters. We illustrate the simplicity of this framework by conducting a systematic literature review on the empirical studies assessing AI in the recruitment process, with 22 final papers included. The review shows that AI is equal to or better than human recruiters when it comes to efficiency and performance. We also find that AI is mostly better than humans in improving diversity. Finally, we demonstrate that there is a perception among candidates and recruiters that AI is worse than humans. Overall, we conclude based on the evidence, that AI is equal to or better to humans when utilised in the hiring process, however, humans hold a belief of their own superiority. Our aim is that future authors adopt the HIRE framework when conducting research in this area to allow for easier comparability, and ideally place the HIRE framework outcome of AI being better, equal, worse, or unclear in the abstract.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/journal/10462
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2022 10:42
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2024 08:00
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/115006

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics