Keen, David ORCID: 0000-0002-7218-8378 (2021) Does democracy protect? The United Kingdom, the United States, and Covid-19. Disasters, 45 (S1). S26 - S47. ISSN 0361-3666
Text (Disasters manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Download (249kB) |
Abstract
The Covid-19 crises in the United Kingdom and the United States show how democracies may struggle to confront disasters that are increasingly impinging on the Global North. This paper highlights the extent to which disasters are now ‘coming home’ to Western democracies and it looks at some of the principal reasons why democracy has not been especially protective, at least in the case of the UK and the US. These include: reconceptualising disaster as a good thing (via ‘herd immunity'); the influence of neoliberalism; and the limitations in the circulation of information. A key pandemic-related danger is the conclusion that democracy itself is discredited. Disasters, though, call for a reinvigoration of democracy, not a knee-jerk invocation of autocratic ‘emergency’ rule. A fundamental problem in the UK and US is that these countries were not democratic enough. The paper underlines the risk of a move towards a disaster-producing system that is self-reinforcing rather than self-correcting.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14677717 |
Additional Information: | © 2021 John Wiley & Sons |
Divisions: | International Development |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain |
Date Deposited: | 03 Dec 2021 12:36 |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2024 07:00 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/112787 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |