Sriram, Shyam K., Gigerich, Will, Patel, Meet and Miller, Kayla (2021) State mask mandates to address COVID-19 have been complicated by anti-mask measures often dating back to the 19th century. USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog (02 Jul 2021). Blog Entry.
Text (usappblog-2021-07-02-state-mask-mandates-to-address-covid-19-have)
- Published Version
Download (294kB) |
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, governors, attorneys general, and public health officials have scrambled to enforce social-distancing guidelines and mask wearing. Their efforts were opposed in several states by those who argue that mandatory face-coverings are unconstitutional. Efforts to enforce mask wearing have been complicated by legacy anti-mask legislation in almost 40 percent of states (and the District of Columbia), which was passed in the 19th– and 20th-centuries in response to organizations like the KKK. Shyam K. Sriram, Will Gigerich, Meet Patel and Kayla Miller discuss the origins, evolution and current impact of anti-mask legislation in the United States.
Item Type: | Online resource (Blog Entry) |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/ |
Additional Information: | © 2021 The Authors |
Divisions: | LSE |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2021 14:57 |
Last Modified: | 14 Sep 2024 03:11 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/111764 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |