Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Partisan context and procedural values: attitudes towards presidential secrecy before and after the 2016 US election

Berliner, Daniel ORCID: 0000-0002-0285-0215 (2020) Partisan context and procedural values: attitudes towards presidential secrecy before and after the 2016 US election. British Journal of Political Science. ISSN 0007-1234

[img] Text (partisan_context_and_procedural_values) - Accepted Version
Download (328kB)

Identification Number: 10.1017/S0007123420000265

Abstract

What shapes attitudes towards procedural rules that constrain executive power? This letter argues that procedural values are contextual: A function of who is in power. Supporters of those in power prefer fewer procedural constraints, while opposition supporters prefer greater. This study reports the results of a unique test using data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Respondents were asked, in both pre- and post-election waves, if they thought it should be ‘easier or harder for the president to keep documents secret from the public’. The panel design makes it possible to track individual changes following the shift in political context. The results show evidence of a partisan ‘flip’ in attitudes following the election, with Republicans becoming less likely – and Democrats more likely – to prefer additional constraints on presidential secrecy. However, this partisan ‘flip’ is present only among higher political knowledge respondents.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-jo...
Additional Information: © 2020 The Author
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
J Political Science > JK Political institutions (United States)
Date Deposited: 14 Sep 2020 16:21
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2021 03:18
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/106553

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics