Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Exploring the identification, validation, and categorization of costs and benefits of education in mental health: the PECUNIA project

Pokhilenko, Irina, Janssen, Luca M.M., Evers, Silvia M.A.A., Drost, Ruben M.W.A., Simon, Judit, König, Hans Helmut, Brodszky, Valentin, Salvador-Carulla, Luis, Park, A-La ORCID: 0000-0002-4704-4874, Hollingworth, William W. and Paulus, Aggie T.G. (2020) Exploring the identification, validation, and categorization of costs and benefits of education in mental health: the PECUNIA project. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 36 (4). pp. 325-331. ISSN 0266-4623

[img] Text (exploring_the_identification_validation_and_categorization_of_costs_and_benefits_of_education_in_mental_health_the_pecunia_project) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (230kB)

Identification Number: 10.1017/S0266462320000203


BackgroundMental health problems can lead to costs and benefits in other sectors (e.g. in the education sector) in addition to the healthcare sector. These related costs and benefits are known as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Although some ICBs within the education sector have been identified previously, little is known about their extensiveness and transferability, which is crucial for their inclusion in health economics research.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify ICBs in the education sector, to validate the list of ICBs in a broader European context, and to categorize the ICBs using mental health as a case study.MethodsPreviously identified ICBs in the education sector were used as a basis for this study. Additional ICBs were extracted from peer-reviewed literature in PubMed and grey literature from six European countries. A comprehensive list of unique items was developed based on the identified ICBs. The list was validated by surveying an international group of educational experts. The survey results were used to finalize the list, which was categorized according to the care atom.ResultsAdditional ICBs in the education sector were retrieved from ninety-six sources. Fourteen experts from six European countries assessed the list for completeness, clarity, and relevance. The final list contained twenty-four ICBs categorized into input, throughput, and output.ConclusionBy providing a comprehensive list of ICBs in the education sector, this study laid further foundations for the inclusion of important societal costs in health economics research in the broader European context.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2020 Cambridge University Press
Divisions: Personal Social Services Research Unit
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Date Deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:51
Last Modified: 16 May 2024 13:43

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics