There is no black and white definition of predatory publishing

Siler, Kyle (2020) There is no black and white definition of predatory publishing. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (13 May 2020). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences_2020-05-13-predatory-publishing) - Published Version Download (1MB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

The nature and extent of predatory publishing is highly contested. Whilst debates have often focused defining journals and publishers as either predatory or not predatory. Kyle Siler argues that predatory publishing encompasses a spectrum of activities and that by understanding this ambiguity, we can better understand and make value judgements over where legitimacy lies in scholarly communication.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2020 The Author
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education Q Science > Q Science (General)
Date Deposited:	15 Jun 2020 10:48
Last Modified:	11 Dec 2024 20:06
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/104853

Actions (login required)

View Item