Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme

Nathan, Max (2019) Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme. CEP Discussion Papers (CEPDP1648). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance, London, UK.

[img] Text - Published Version
Download (2MB)

Abstract

Despite academic scepticism, cluster policies remain popular with policymakers. This paper evaluates the causal impact of a flagship UK technology cluster programme. I build a simple framework and identify effects using difference-in-differences and synthetic controls on rich microdata. I further test for timing, cross-space variation, scaling and churn channels. The policy grew and densified the cluster, but has had more mixed effects on tech firm productivity. I also find most policy ‘effects’ began before rollout, raising questions about the programme’s added value.

Item Type: Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Official URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion...
Additional Information: © 2019 The Author
Divisions: Centre for Economic Performance
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
JEL classification: L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L53 - Government Promotion of Firms
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R3 - Production Analysis and Firm Location > R30 - General
R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R50 - General
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2020 14:15
Last Modified: 06 Mar 2024 15:15
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103421

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics