Sanders, Jet G.
ORCID: 0000-0002-9951-2799 and Jenkins, Rob
(2018)
Individual differences in hyper-realistic mask detection.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implicators, 3 (1).
ISSN 2365-7464
|
Text (Individual difference in hyper-realistic mask detection)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Hyper-realistic masks present a new challenge to security and crime prevention. We have recently shown that people’s ability to differentiate these masks from real faces is extremely limited. Here we consider individual differences as a means to improve mask detection. Participants categorized single images as masks or real faces in a computer-based task. Experiment 1 revealed poor accuracy (40%) and large individual differences (5–100%) for high-realism masks among low-realism masks and real faces. Individual differences in mask categorization accuracy remained large when the Low-realism condition was eliminated (Experiment 2). Accuracy for mask images was not correlated with accuracy for real face images or with prior knowledge of hyper-realistic face masks. Image analysis revealed that mask and face stimuli were most strongly differentiated in the region below the eyes. Moreover, high-performing participants tracked the differential information in this area, but low-performing participants did not. Like other face tasks (e.g. identification), hyper-realistic mask detection gives rise to large individual differences in performance. Unlike many other face tasks, performance may be localized to a specific image cue.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2018 The Authors |
| Divisions: | Psychological and Behavioural Science |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2019 14:54 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Oct 2025 21:54 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101394 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |

Download Statistics
Download Statistics