Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Theory-ladenness: testing the ‘untestable'

Votsis, Ioannis (2018) Theory-ladenness: testing the ‘untestable'. Synthese. ISSN 0039-7857

[img] Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (662kB)
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11229-018-01992-y

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate two potential ways to experimentally test the thesis that observation is theory-laden. One is a proposal due to Schurz (J Gen Philos Sci 46:139–153, 2015) and the other my own. The two are compared and found to have some features in common. One such feature is that both proposals seek to create conditions that compel test subjects with diverse theoretical backgrounds to resort to bare (or at least as bare as possible) observational judgments. Thus, if judgments made under those conditions are convergent across test subjects, the said convergence would lend credibility to the view that theory-neutral observations are feasible. This still leaves the question of why any such convergence exists unanswered. Towards the end of the paper, it is argued that the best explanation for observational judgment convergence is the veridicality of those judgments.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/journal/11229
Additional Information: © 2018 The Author
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Sets: Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Date Deposited: 02 Jan 2019 10:46
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2020 01:47
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/91413

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics