Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries

Maynou, Laia and Cairns, John (2018) What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries. Health Policy, 123 (2). pp. 130-139. ISSN 0168-8510

[img] Text - Accepted Version
Repository staff only until 20 November 2019.

Download (787kB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.003

Abstract

Background: Decisions on the reimbursement of the same cancer drugs are different across European countries, but empirical work on the reasons behind these differences has been scarce. The main objective of this paper is to make a methodological contribution to existing research, specifically by outlining the systematic process of analysis to address such questions and determining the factors that might lead to different drug reimbursement decisions, and to explore its application in the field of oncology. Methods: Reimbursement decisions on cancer drugs in six European countries (Belgium, England, Poland, Portugal, Scotland, and Sweden) between 2006 and 2014 were included in the study. A taxonomy was developed, comprising two groups of variables (system-level and product-specific) and an econometric model was specified (multilevel mixed-effects ordered probit). Results: Only one in six evaluations in the sample reach the same reimbursement recommendation. Most health system variables were not determinants of a higher or lower probability of a positive reimbursement recommendation. However, the probability of reimbursement was higher when a drug was considered cost-effective by NICE/SMC and when there was a financial Managed Entry Agreement. This work also demonstrated a possible econometric approach for analysing differences in reimbursement decisions and contributes a structured approach for collecting and preparing data for such analyses. Conclusions: Drug reimbursement decisions can be analysed in detail along a set of factors that are related to each decision. This information is essential, not only for understanding why a particular drug is accepted in one country and not in another but also when trying to implement a new HTA system or reform an existing one. This analysis provides policy makers and stakeholders with a model that enables a better understanding of the factors that drive HTA decisions and is adaptable to answer similar questions. Moreover, the data collection limitations encountered and described in this work shed light on the need for greater accessibility and transparency in HTA systems and regarding HTA outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/health-policy
Additional Information: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Divisions: Health Policy
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
JEL classification: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
Sets: Departments > Health Policy
Date Deposited: 28 Nov 2018 16:20
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2019 00:15
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/90877

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics