Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations

Muthukrishna, Michael, Henrich, Joseph, Toyakawa, Wataru, Hamamura, Takeshi, Kameda, Tatsuya and Heine, Steven J. (2018) Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations. PLOS ONE. ISSN 1932-6203 (In Press)

[img] Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (5MB)
[img] Text - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202288

Abstract

Overconfidence is sometimes assumed to be a human universal, but there remains a dearth of data systematically measuring overconfidence across populations and contexts. Moreover, cross-cultural experiments often fail to distinguish between placement and precision and worse still, often compare population-mean placement estimates rather than individual performance subtracted from placement. Here we introduce a procedure for concurrently capturing both placement and precision at an individual level based on individual performance: The Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure. We conducted experiments using the EGO procedure, manipulating domain, task knowledge, and incentives across four populations— Japanese, Hong Kong Chinese, Euro Canadians, and East Asian Canadians. We find that previous measures of population-level overconfidence may have been misleading; rather than universal, overconfidence is highly context dependent. Our results reveal cross-cultural differences in sensitivity to incentives and differences in overconfidence strategies, with underconfidence, accuracy, and overconfidence. Comparing sexes, we find inconsistent results for overplacement, but that males are consistently more confident in their placement. These findings have implications for our understanding of the adaptive value of overconfidence and its role in explaining population-level and individual-level differences in economic and psychological behavior.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Additional Information: © 2018 the Authors
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Sets: Departments > Psychological and Behavioural Science
Date Deposited: 24 Aug 2018 13:29
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2019 20:58
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/90097

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics