Valentini, Laura (2018) Interactive justice, the boundary problem, and proportionality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. ISSN 1369-8230
|
Text
- Accepted Version
Download (281kB) | Preview |
Identification Number: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1481610
Abstract
In Interactive Justice, Emanuela Ceva argues that the parties to an intractable value conflict should each be given an equal substantive right to a hearing. I suggest that Ceva’s account gives insufficient attention to the question of who counts as a party to a value conflict. Once more attention to this question is given, her defence of an equal right to a hearing may be put into question.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/current |
Additional Information: | © 2018 Informa UK Limited |
Divisions: | Government |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JC Political theory K Law > K Law (General) |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2018 11:26 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2024 21:03 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/89376 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |