Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Barriers to equity in REDD+: deficiencies in national interpretation processes constrain adaptation to context

Dawson, Neil M., Mason, Michael ORCID: 0000-0002-8831-0593, Mwayafu, David Mujasi, Dhungana, Hari, Satyal, Poshendra, Fisher, Janet A., Zeitoun, Mark and Schroeder, Heike (2018) Barriers to equity in REDD+: deficiencies in national interpretation processes constrain adaptation to context. Environmental Science and Policy, 88. pp. 1-9. ISSN 1462-9011

Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (329kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.009


A national interpretation process involving diverse actors and interests is required to transform global environmental initiatives into policies appropriate to the national or subnational context. These processes of localising norms are critical spaces to formulate equitable pathways to environmental conservation, yet have received limited attention from policy makers and researchers. We explored national policy processes for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) in Uganda and Nepal from the perspectives of ‘intermediaries’, state and civil society actors at subnational and national scale who promote the interests of various stakeholder groups. Through think-tank meetings and semi-structured interviews with a range of intermediaries, we uncovered that REDD+ implementation processes in both countries are dominated by international actors, applying a demanding administrative agenda and restricting space for deliberation. Consequently, social aspects of policy were compartmentalised, reduced to technical exercises and local equity concerns inadequately addressed in national REDD+ policies. For example, social safeguards approaches were perceived to lack substantive guidelines to promote equity. Limited national political space to criticise government policy and lack of attention to relevant evidence further restricted ability to address entrenched injustices such as status inequalities faced by marginalised groups. Although civil society organisations choose to maintain official involvement with REDD+, many expressed a possibility they would oppose REDD+ in future, or serious doubts about its design and expected outcomes. Concerns centred on lack of recognition of indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ values, identities, practices and institutions such as customary tenure systems, alongside possible detrimental impacts to decentralised forest governance regimes, well established in Nepal and emerging in Uganda. We suggest features to be enshrined in REDD+ policy for adapting national interpretation processes to become more effective spaces for empowering diverse intermediaries to negotiate and influence localisation of international norms, ultimately to promote more equitable pathways to reduced deforestation and degradation.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2018 The Author(s)
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 19 Jun 2018 14:00
Last Modified: 15 May 2024 23:18
Projects: ES/N005740/1
Funders: Economic and Social Research Council, DFID

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics