Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Measuring well-being: a multidimensional index integrating subjective well-being and preferences

Yang, Lin (2018) Measuring well-being: a multidimensional index integrating subjective well-being and preferences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19 (4). pp. 456-476. ISSN 1945-2829

[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (779kB) | Preview
[img] Text - Accepted Version
Repository staff only until 23 November 2019.

Download (552kB) | Request a copy
Identification Number: 10.1080/19452829.2018.1474859

Abstract

Policymakers have begun looking for multidimensional alternatives to income-based measures for assessing well-being in societies. The Human Development Index and related composite indices have been widely criticised in the welfare economic literature, yet are still some of the most influential income-alternatives in the research and policy arena. What are the theoretical links that bridge the gap between these composite indices and the criticisms levelled at them? This paper introduces the “preference index approach”, a multidimensional measure bringing together the “equivalence approach” and the “distance function” in welfare economic theory. It retains convenient similarities with HDI-type composite indices, but assesses well-being in a way that reflects interpersonal differences in preferences between dimensions of well-being, whilst retaining comparability of well-being levels between individuals. The approach is applied empirically with data from the British Household Panel Survey to estimate different preference types between well-being dimensions. The empirical application finds that preferences differ by age, education level and unemployment status, and finds a weaker preference for the health and income dimension within older groups. Across all groups, health is strongly prioritised over income. When preference heterogeneities are taken into account, the picture of well-being looks quite different than that painted by standard welfare measures.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjhd20/current
Additional Information: © 2018 Informa UK Limited
Divisions: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
JEL classification: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare; Basic Needs; Living Standards; Quality of Life; Happiness
Sets: Research centres and groups > Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE)
Date Deposited: 08 May 2018 09:32
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2019 00:09
Projects: ES/J500070/1
Funders: Economic and Social Research Council
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/87789

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics