Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A new approach to formulating and appraising drug policy: a multi-criterion decision analysis applied to alcohol and cannabis regulation

Rogeberg, Ole, Bergsvik, Daniel, Phillips, Lawrence D., Amsterdam, Jan van, Eastwood, Niamh, Henderson, Graeme, Lynskey, Michael, Measham, Fiona, Ponton, Rhys, Rolles, Steve, Schlag, Anne Katrin, Taylor, Polly and Nutt, David (2018) A new approach to formulating and appraising drug policy: a multi-criterion decision analysis applied to alcohol and cannabis regulation. International Journal of Drug Policy. ISSN 0955-3959

[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.019

Abstract

Background Drug policy, whether for legal or illegal substances, is a controversial field that encompasses many complex issues. Policies can have effects on a myriad of outcomes and stakeholders differ in the outcomes they consider and value, while relevant knowledge on policy effects is dispersed across multiple research disciplines making integrated judgements difficult. Methods Experts on drug harms, addiction, criminology and drug policy were invited to a decision conference to develop a multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA) model for appraising alternative regulatory regimes. Participants collectively defined regulatory regimes and identified outcome criteria reflecting ethical and normative concerns. For cannabis and alcohol separately, participants evaluated each regulatory regime on each criterion and weighted the criteria to provide summary scores for comparing different regimes. Results Four generic regulatory regimes were defined: absolute prohibition, decriminalisation, state control and free market. Participants also identified 27 relevant criteria which were organised into seven thematically related clusters. State control was the preferred regime for both alcohol and cannabis. The ranking of the regimes was robust to variations in the criterion-specific weights. Conclusion The MCDA process allowed the participants to deconstruct complex drug policy issues into a set of simpler judgements that led to consensus about the results.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/internationa...
Additional Information: © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Divisions: Management
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Sets: Departments > Management
Date Deposited: 02 May 2018 10:50
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2019 00:08
Projects: 240235
Funders: Norwegian Research Council
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/87733

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics