Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The rise of China's new-type think tanks and the internationalization of the state

Hayward, Jane (2018) The rise of China's new-type think tanks and the internationalization of the state. Pacific Affairs, 91 (1). pp. 27-47. ISSN 0030-851X

[img] Text - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (571kB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.5509/201891127

Abstract

China’s government is promoting new-type think tanks. These are often treated with scepticism by Western observers, due to their lack of independence from government and operation within a controlled intellectual environment. In this article, I heed recent calls by scholars to analyze think tanks, and how they develop, in their particular national political contexts. In China’s case, this is a powerful one-party state undergoing internationalization: usually understood as increased foreign exchanges, engagement with international institutions, and rising influence globally. In contrast, I view internationalization as the reorganizing of China’s state institutions and social structure in order to integrate with the global capitalist system. Through these processes, China’s policymaking community is converging with a powerful transnational class aligned with global capitalist interests. Think tanks are implicated in these processes, and are therefore involved in shaping capitalist class dynamics within China. This is a cause for concern and debate among policy makers, regarding “civil” think tanks in particular, which are non-governmental and privately funded. Drawing on interviews with Chinese think-tank scholars, and examining policy debates on the development of think tanks in Chinese academic and policy journals, I argue that the sphere of think tanks has become an important site of political contestation concerning China’s internationalization and the impact of class power on national policy making. Western observers, too often viewing independence as the key criterion for evaluating China’s think tanks, miss the significance of these debates. The relations between think tanks and government institutions must be understood in this political context.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.pacificaffairs.ubc.ca/
Additional Information: © 2018 Pacific Affairs
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Sets: Departments > Government
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2018 10:23
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2019 06:43
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/87100

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics