Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform

Bai, James and Hobbs, Harry (2017) Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform. Alternative Law Journal, 42 (4). pp. 286-291. ISSN 1037-969X

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (629kB) | Preview
Identification Number: 10.1177/1037969X17732707

Abstract

Throughout 2016, Attorney-General George Brandis QC repeatedly denied he intended to leave the Federal Parliament and take up a position on the High Court of Australia. In this article we explore the experiences of the two most recent politicians-cum-High Court Justices: Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy; and note that Australia’s current judicial appointment process would have permitted Brandis to make a similar transition. We argue that this process should be revamped to enhance transparency and accountability in the appointments process, to the benefit of our judicial system and its public perception.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/alj
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Sets: Departments > Law
Date Deposited: 21 Feb 2018 10:29
Last Modified: 21 Feb 2018 10:40
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/86816

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics