Our current conceptualisation of peer review must be expanded if we're to realise the greatest innovations

Treadway, Jon (2017) Our current conceptualisation of peer review must be expanded if we're to realise the greatest innovations. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (14 Sep 2017). Website.

Preview

Text - Published Version Download (163kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

All agree that peer review is an area of scholarly communications that is ripe for innovation. However, it may be that our current conceptualisation of peer review places limits on our progress and ambitions. Jon Treadway highlights four alternative tracks of development, including an increased recognition of the many diverse contributions to the research process, a renewed and widened understanding of what constitutes a “peer”, and a robust evidence base for which techniques and modes of review most consistently benefit authors and the wider scholarly record.

Item Type:	Online resource (Website)
Official URL:	http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2017 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Date Deposited:	01 Nov 2017 12:53
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 01:36
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/85028

Actions (login required)

View Item