Swaine, Aisling 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5782-5084
(2016)
Enabling or disabling paternalism: (in)attention to gender and women’s knowledge, capacity and authority in humanitarian contexts.
In: Barnett, Michael N., (ed.)
Paternalism Beyond Borders.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 185-233.
ISBN 9781316799956
Abstract
In 2006, working with an international aid agency in Darfur, Sudan, I was part of a large yet very constrained humanitarian response operation. Having worked in many prior operations globally, this was somewhat different. Humanitarian operations established in response to the Darfur crisis were severely and deliberately hampered by the Sudanese government. In an attempt to thwart international attention to a situation that was increasingly being noted for extensive human rights violations, international and national organizations were subject to a very effective intimidation campaign. It was so successful that international agencies performed operations as if walking on eggshells. There was a tacit consensus among agencies that the best-case scenario was to strive to maintain the provision of basic services, even where this meant working around, and saying little publicly about, the rights violations that were occurring within and outside the camps. I was working on what might have been considered the most sensitive issue in that context at that time – the prolific use of sexualized violence, particularly rape, against women by parties to the conflict in Darfur. Sexualized violence in wartime is generally understood as a gendered violence, primarily impacting women and working off of gendered norms of power and inequalities between men and women. The prolific use of sexualized violence by armed actors became synonymous with the Darfur conflict in the global media in ways that had not been seen since the wars in the former Yugoslavia. The image of the raped female victim also became ubiquitous with Darfur and in many ways became a cornerstone of the multiple global advocacy movements that arose to decry what was happening there. In this highly charged political situation, the act of rape and other kinds of sexualized violence took on hyper political significance. With the eyes of the International Criminal Court on the Darfur situation at the time, and the US government also making noise about possible genocide, the act of rape, formerly prosecuted as a component of genocide in the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, invoked political significance for a government that could be held culpable.
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://www.cambridge.org/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2016 The Author |
| Divisions: | Gender Studies |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology J Political Science > JX International law J Political Science > JZ International relations |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2017 15:39 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 17:33 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/84635 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
